Investment Trusts
And Schroder Oriental Income Fund Ltd (SOI)
Caricature of Sir Philip Rose, Vanity Fair 1881, courtesy Wikipedia.
Sir Philip Rose founded the first
investment trust in 1868 for investors of modest means. He called it The Foreign & Colonial Government Trust
and it specialised in investing in Government bonds. In 1891 it changed its
name to The Foreign & Colonial Investment Trust and it first started
investing in equities
in 1925. Today it has assets of £2.6 billion.
Investment Trusts (ITs), whose shares are
traded on the stock market like companies, have long been recognised as
appropriate vehicles for illiquid investments in assets such as property,
unlisted companies and infrastructure. Open
Ended Investment Companies (OEICs, including Unit Trusts) and Exchange Traded
Funds (ETFs), where investors may withdraw funds from the underlying
assets, are not as suitable for such asset classes.
While ETFs have captured the largest
share of managed equity funds, ITs
hold certain advantages for equities over both ETFs and OEICs for the
discerning investor. A major reason is that ITs generally perform better than either ETFs or OEICs in equity
markets, according to an Investors
Chronicle article (27 July 2012). This is confirmed by performance data,
updated monthly, at http://www.theaic.co.uk/aic/statistics/aic-stats
The following table covers 10 years'
performance to May 2012 by sector.
Sector
|
Investment
trusts
|
Oeics/Unit
trusts
|
Benchmark
|
Global
|
174.1
|
140.2
|
148.4
|
Global equity income
|
187.3
|
NA
|
148.4
|
UK equity income
|
165.2
|
146.8
|
144.1
|
UK
|
178.3
|
150
|
158.1
|
North America
|
139.1
|
122.6
|
142.6
|
Europe ex UK
|
173.2
|
143.4
|
147.2
|
Global emerging markets
|
398.9
|
298.7
|
325.6
|
Asia Pacific ex Japan
|
286.7
|
247.1
|
282.2
|
Source: Investors Chronicle 27 July 2012.
ITs
perform better than OEICs and ETFs for equity investors because:
·
The fees
and expenses incurred by ITs are
substantially lower than those charged by OEICs, though they are somewhat higher
than ETFs.
·
IT
managers can leverage their gains with borrowed funds.
·
IT
managers follow long-term investment strategies, knowing that funds cannot
be withdrawn from their portfolios. Managers of OEICs feel constrained by
quarterly reporting and the fear that funds will be withdrawn if they perform
below their benchmarks. As a result, OEICs sometimes become high cost index
trackers.
·
ITs are
never forced to buy or sell in their chosen markets. OEICs and ETFs are
forced to do so as investors buy or sell their units. The ebb and flow of funds
also increases the trading costs of OIECs and EFTs.
·
The price
of OEICs and EFTs is linked exactly to the underlying fund's net asset value.
Meanwhile ITs trade at a discount or
premium to net asset value. This enables ITs
to buy back their shares when they trade at a discount and to sell them when
they trade at a premium to net asset value (NAV).
·
On
average, IT managers add 'alpha' - they do better than their benchmarks.
Investment Trust investors will note that:
1.
The first step is to chose a theme - growth or
income, geographical region, asset class etc. - and then review the available ITs listed at Morningstar or similar
websites.
2.
The
opportunity of buying assets at a discount to NAV should not be ignored. But
there is usually a good reason for a high discount. INVISTA EUROPEAN REAL ESTATE IT trades at an 87% discount to NAV, but its
borrowings are almost 6 times the value of assets and it is capitalised at only
£7 million pounds. This is only for speculative investors. Evidently buying
into an IT at a premium to NAV is best avoided, unless the investor has
a compelling reason to do so.
3.
Unlike
OEICs, ITs provide considerable information on their finances and
investment strategies. This helps investors to find a manager who shares their
investment criteria.
4.
As in any investment, it is a positive sign when
managers own a substantial stake in their companies.
5.
While
most ITs do not gear their investments by more than 10 to 15%, some do.
This adds an element of risk, which in a downturn could hit the value of its
shares.
6.
Small ITs,
say with a free float of less than £50 million, are best avoided. Their shares
can become illiquid and their bid to offer spread widen in a selloff.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schroder Oriental Income Fund Ltd (SOI)
Sydney International Airport,
courtesy Wikipedia
After a year when equities in the Asia
Pacific region (excluding Japan) have recorded a net loss, compared to the
substantial gains in the developed markets of the USA, Japan and Europe, it
does not take much of a contrarian to take an interest in this region of the
globe. When regions or asset classes are out of favour, the share price of
investment trusts specialising in these areas often move to a discount. This is
the case with Schroder Oriental Income
Fund Ltd (SOI), which currently trades at a 5% discount to net asset value
(NAV).
SOI Share price premium/discount to Net
Asset Value, courtesy Investors Chronicle,
click to enlarge
SOI was founded in July 2005 to "provide
a total return for investors primarily through investments in equities and
equity-related investments, of companies which are based in, or which derive a
significant proportion of their revenues from, the Asia Pacific region and
which offer attractive yields." (Company factsheet).
SOI has consistently beaten its benchmark,
the MSCI Asia Pacific ex Japan Index:
Annualised Returns %
|
1 YEAR
|
3 YEAR p.a.
|
5 YEAR p.a.
|
Since 2005 p.a.
|
SOI - Net Asset
Value
|
-6.7%
|
7.6%
|
22.4%
|
11.2%
|
MSCI Asia Pacific
ex-Japan GBP
|
-7.0%
|
0.8%
|
15.2%
|
9.6%
|
Matthew Dobbs has managed SOI since its
launch in 2005. According to FE Trustnet, he has outperformed his peer group of managers by 77% in the past 10
years. SOI has 68% of its funds invested in Australia, Singapore,
Hong-Kong and Taiwan, with the remainder invested in China, South Korea,
Thailand, New Zealand, Indonesia and the Philippines. Larger investments
include Fortune Real Estate (Hong Kong), Taiwan Semiconductor, Sydney Airport,
China Petroleum and Chemical and HSBC. The total number of holding is 72, which
is not large for an IT with £400 million invested.
At its current price of 164p, SOI yields 4.5%
and it is on a price earnings ratio (based solely on revenue) of 19. The IT has a net gearing of just 3.3%. Seven institutional investors
each own more than 3% of the fund's shares.
SOI has a good trading record. Consider:
1.
Revenue
earnings per share (excluding capital gains and losses) and dividends have
grown by 7% cumulatively per annum since 2007.
2.
SOI has
returned a total gain on NAV of 148% since launch, 30% better than the
benchmark return of 118% over the same period.
3.
Total
charges amount to 0.93% per annum, about half the charges of a comparable OEIC.
4.
The fund
issues or buys back shares to ensure that its share price does not move far
from its NAV. By selling when the share price moves to a premium and by buying
when it falls to a discount, shareholder returns are improved.
5. The lead manager, from Schroder Investment
Management, has been with the IT since its launch. Continuity, with a good
performing IT, is important.
Using
the dividend discount model, SOI
would be valued at between 160p (discounting at 12%) and 260p (discounting at
10%), which compares to its current share price of 164p. This assumes that
dividends continue to increase by 7% per annum indefinitely, though values
beyond 20 years become tiny.
Main
risks are:
Ø The
fund is highly dependent on what happens in China. Chinese gross public debt to
GDP is estimated at 200% and for the first time public bodies have been allowed
to default on their debts. Political risks in the region, both in North Korea
and with Chinese claims in the East and South China Seas, are a concern.
Ø
The fund invests in a wide range of currencies,
none of which are tied to sterling.
Ø There
is fear among investors that we may be on the brink of a financial crisis in
the region.
Note:
the next article will appear around 5 April.
I don't understand, why ETFs are forced to sell, they're shares are traded in the market. OEICs do but ETFs have no reason to.
ReplyDeleteETFs can have discounts too, though if the tracking error is small, the divergence from NAV is usually tight due to the availability of ETF certificated to institutional investors.
If investors withdraw funds from a market via ETFs, then the ETFs must sell holdings to reimburse their investors. This is not the situation with investment trusts. It is quite true that ETF performance might not match the index they are following and so their price might be higher or lower than the index they are tracking. However,ETFs are never priced at a discount or premium to their underlying assets.
Delete